204 vs 223 ballistics chart

The .22-250 Remington and .220 Swift are very close to each other in almost all performance categories. The 220 Swift I have no experience with yet. The 204 will have a flatter trajectory and less wind drift than the 22-250. The vast majority of predator and varmint hunters probably agree the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are all excellent cartridges for pest control. That being said, the .22-250 Remington and, to a lesser extent, the .220 Swift can also work in this role. Cartridge Type: RifleHeight: 1.84"Width: 0.378"Average FPS: 3935Average Energy: 1272Average Gr: 37Recoil: 0.6Power Rank: 1.46 of 20. I had to finish off animals shot with the other calibres ( chest shots) as they did not go down immediately. While none are really good choices for extreme long range shooting, all of these cartridges are highly regarded for their accuracy. Introduced as a joint project between Ruger and Hornady in 2004, the .204 Ruger continued that trend of lighter recoiling varmint cartridges that fit into a smaller case. As I’ve stated before: the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are all excellent rifle cartridges. Ammo Description Velocity (fps) Energy (ft/lb) Trajectory Tables (inches) CARTRIDGE BULLET ITEM # MUZ 100 yd 200 yd 300 yd 400 yd 500 yd MUZ 100 yd 200 yd 300 yd 400 yd 500 yd MUZ 100 yd 200 yd 300 yd 400 yd 500 yd M 223 Rem 68 gr. The 204 flat outperforms the 223, but will cost a bit more to buy factory … "One requirement for this new military cartridge was that the bullet would remain supersonic to 500 yards. While all three other cartridges are virtually non-existent in semi-automatic rifles, the .223 Remington is extremely popular in semi-auto platforms. My rifle hates factory ammo. To get that tack driving accuracy I believe you must work up a handload for the Swift. The .204 Ruger is not well suited for big game hunting at all. BTHP 80289 2960 2697 2449 2215 1993 1786 1323 1098 906 741 600 482 -1 517 0-7 -22 -454 M 223 … There’s also a much bigger supply of .223 Remington factory ammo suitable for big game hunting (like the Barnes VOR-TX, the Hornady GMX, and the Nosler E-Tip and Partition) than any of the other cartridges. This energy has the advantage at longer distances and the .308 doesn’t drop as far as the .223 past 500 yards. Meat prices were reflected in where the animal was shot, so head shots were the most profotiable. Maximum pressure obtained from SAAMI (p171 and p172). Buy a great .22-250 Remington hunting rifle here. The .223 Remington wins hands down here since it’s arguably the easiest to find and least expensive centerfire cartridge in the United States. Compare all .223 ammunition manufacturers on one chart. The .224″ bullets used by the .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are also used by their Ackley Improved cousins as well as other cartridges like the .218 Bee, the .219 Zipper, the .221 Fireball, the 22 Creedmoor, the .22 PPC, the .222 Remington Magnum, the .223 WSSM, the .224 Valkyrie, and the .224 Weatherby Magnum. The .204 is faster with a considerably better trajectory (-5 to -6 inches @ 300 yards w/ 150 yard zero vs. -9 to -10 inches for the .223). It will be as good or better than a 220 Swift at 3800 fps w/55's. Hornady factory ballistics for the original 32 grain V-Max bullet in the .204 Ruger claim a MV of 4225 fps and muzzle energy (ME) of 1308 ft. lbs. Thanks for your support. Really long range. I was going to buy thr 204. so thanks for helping make up my mine. When comparing modern factory loads, the .220 Swift has very small (or practically non-existent in some cases) advantages in velocity, trajectory, kinetic energy, and wind drift. Clearly, the .22-250 is a better tool for taking shots at extreme ranges than either the .223 Rem. at 100 yards, 3025 fps and 671 ft. lbs. Handloaders can wring a tiny bit more performance out of the .220 Swift, but there’s a much better selection of rifles and factory ammo with the .22-250. If your preference is a black rifle, the choice is between .223 and .204. Winchester released their new cartridge in 1935 as the .220 Winchester Swift. help make it a popular centerfire cartridge. The .220 Swift typically uses bullets in the 40-60 grain range while the .22-250 usually shoots 35-64 grain bullets. In order to conduct a more useful comparison, the .220 Swift ballistics below are for a maximum handload provided by Hornady in their 10th Edition Handbook of Cartridge Reloading (p214): a 55gr V-Max at 3,800fps. The AR-15 is limited to the .223-diameter rim, so it is not chambered for the .22-250,. Are you looking for a cartridge with lots of inexpensive ammo for general plinking or target shooting? Regulations are designed to preclude experimentation with less than suitable calibers. The extended range makes The .223 Remington wins over the .222 and its larger rival, the .22-250 in good ballistics with the minimum of powder and maximum efficiency. On the downside, the .204 Ruger is indeed more vulnerable to wind drift than the .22-250 and .220 Swift (but not the .223) and does not retain energy nearly as well as the others. J. I’m looking to replace my Rem. rifle shell casing based off the .222 Remington Magnum design with a small rifle primer. The calibres were 30.06 , .270, .308 and I used a .22/50. While that’s true to a certain degree, it actually drifts less than the .223 Remington. They’re all high velocity, flat shooting cartridges, but the .204 Ruger has the least arching trajectory of the bunch. The .22-250 Remington and .220 Swift have a significantly flatter trajectory are more resistance to wind drift than the .223 Remington, so they have a definite advantage as ranges increase as well as in windy conditions. Novelty, perhaps. The .204 Ruger and .22-250 Remington are both fairly reasonably priced, but the .220 Swift is the most expensive of the bunch. The other three cartridges use Hornady factory loads. It didn’t take long at all for designers to start building even smaller bore cartridges with correspondingly higher muzzle velocities. It also has a better selection of ammunition and rifles than the .204 Ruger, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift. When used in a quality rifle by a skilled shooter, they’re all capable of tack driving accuracy. 204 r uger v elocity d ata "For these tests I chose a T/C Contender in 24" length as a starting point. With this in mind, the vast majority of .223 Remington factory loads shoot bullets in the 35-90 grain range. As expected, each of the large bores turned the water jugs inside out in spectacular fashion – albeit with significant recoil (the .458 was the mildest, owing to the heavy weight of the stock and action). HORNADY AMMUNITION BALLISTICS V Varmint Express ™LE LEVERevolution® C Custom™ LM Light Mag HM Heavy Mag T TAP FPD™ M Match HORNADY PRODUCT LINES Ammo Description Velocity (fps) / Energy (ft/lb) Trajectory Tables CARTRIDGE BULLET ITEM # MUZZLE 100 yds 200 yds 300 yds 400 yds 500 yds MUZZLE 100 … Sako and Savage (among other companies) manufactured rifles in .220 Swift as well. I bought a Ruger 77 in .220 back in the ’70’s. It’s quite interesting to to see facts on velocities and trajectories rather than the rifle owners biased opinion about “my gun shoots better and further than yours” story. public version of the .204 Ruger are slower, but still in the upper echelon of ft/s making that continue to This is why you can order a Remington R-15 in .204 Ruger as well as .223 Rem. How to Sight in a Scope - Step by Step Guide. Excellent article John! I was anxious to try handloading, and found a very hot load to be used with HPSpBT match bullets that I took out to the range. I shot both of these species way back when for a living( export venison meat sales) I shot with four companions in Fiordland New Zealand, both on the bush and along the tops. The .223 Remington falls more or less in the middle: it has less recoil and retains less kinetic energy than the .22-250 and .220 Swift, but more than the .204 Ruger. Each one prints a .5 MOA group or less with the right loads. Greetings, Very comprehensive article. After many trips to the Dakota’s prairie dog hunting and many many round’s fired through the Swift it was time for a new barrel. Respect the animal! The .204 Ruger is especially great for small creatures like prairie dogs and foxes, though it will certainly do the job on coyotes as well. This rifle has proven exceptionally accurate and has NEVER shot less than MOA no matter what ammo it was fed. Next, the .204 Ruger and .223 Remington both have a maximum overall length of 2.26″ which is shorter than the 2.35″ length of the .22-250 Remington and the 2.68″ long .220 Swift. Not surprisingly, the resulting cartridge was capable of even higher velocities than its parent and Wotkyns submitted his brainchild to Winchester for commercial development. Complete .223 Remington ammunition ballistics Chart. Are you very sensitive to recoil? Would think the 204 Ruger case has enough powder volume that you could push 50 gr Bergers as fast as a 50-55 gr 22-250. The .223 I load from 69-77 grain loads for it and the DPMS is not picky and shoots them all on top of each other from various brands. Very good article. As I referenced earlier in the article, the .220 Swift performs best at near maximum velocity. Particularly interesting observations on the .22-250 and its versatility. It’s a fine old rifle, but what I noticed immediately upon comparing the swift with a 223 CZ was the weight difference between the 2 rifles. from a 24" test barrel. However, each one has different strengths and weaknesses. Additionally, grain for grain, 20-Caliber bullets have higher ballistic coefficients than .224 bullets. The .220 Swift was also available for a short period of time in the Winchester Model 54 rifle. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .223 Remington vs .243 Winchester ammo rounds. The .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift are all very accurate, flat shooting, and high velocity cartridges. THey would certainly fall down where reckless unaimed body shots were taked. This makes it a good choice This helps support the blog and allows me to continue to create free content that’s useful to hunters like yourself. Grosvenor Wotkyns (of .22 Hornet fame) took things a step further by necking down the .250/3000 Savage to .22 caliber. Regards, Clint Walker. Federal, Hornady, Jamison, HSM, Norma, Remington, and Winchester all currently manufacture .220 Swift ammo. On the other hand, faster rifling twists are much more common with the .223 Remington and it’s possible to find rifles chambered in the cartridge with 1:12″, 1:10″, 1:9″, 1:8″ and even 1:7″ rifling twist rates that can stabilize longer and heavier bullets. ground hogs. This means I will earn a small commission (at no extra cost to you) if you make a purchase. The .204 Ruger is considered to be accurate on distances up to 270 yards. Nosler Accubonds and match bullets probably the best. S 223 rem 75 gr. It also achieved a velocity and trajectory virtually on par with the .220 Swift (particularly when compared to the increasingly common reduced Swift loads) while utilizing a more efficient design that fit into a smaller package and burned less powder. Felt recoil will vary from shooter to shooter and rifle to rifle, but free recoil energy is still a useful way to compare cartridges.All four cartridges have an exceptionally mild recoil and virtually any person, regardless of size or age, should be able to handle them with ease. The .223 and .22-250 are also available in a few loads designed for big game hunting like the Barnes VOR-TX and the Nosler Partition. Are you looking for an ideal cartridge to use in an AR-15 platform? The .204 Ruger is a cartridge capable of purging a lot of song dogs from farms, or for high-speed fun at the range. This is a .223 ballistics chart (external) generated using our ballistic trajectory calculator. Though some of the differences between them are significant, the distinction between the cartridges in other areas may seem like splitting hairs at times. It will handle all velocities from about 1500 up to 4500 and the performance of most of the other standard and wildcat cartridges can be equaled. For instance, the Hornady Varmint Express factory loads for the .220 Swift and .22-250 Rem have identical ballistics shooting the same 55gr V-Max bullet at 3,680fps. Even though Winchester opted not to utilize the .250 Savage as the basis for the .220 Swift, many wildcatters continued to neck the Savage case down to .22 caliber over the ensuing decades. Of these, 50 grain, 55 grain, 62 grain, and to a lesser extent, 75 and 77 grain bullet weights are most common. The .220 Swift was quite effective on small game, predators, and varmints, but many hunters experienced uneven results when using the cartridge on big game like deer. However, I generally discourage the average hunter from taking those shots (no offense whatsoever to you) and instead recommend aiming for the heart/lungs. 0.0 indicates yardage at which firearm was sighted in. you will have a larger selection of ammo and bullets in .223 the .204 is a lighter round for the most part, but seems to work fine with the right bullets, I have heard reports (some local here) of good hits on coyotes with the .204 that didint get a good kill, shot placement and bullet selection are more important with the lighter … 204 Ruger Ballistics. I have both calibers and quite honestly prefer the 204 over the 223. the 223 is more readily available as loaded ammo, but components are out there for both if you reload. After all, there’s a good reason why they are among the most popular centerfire small bore rifle cartridges in the country. All of the other cartridges, including the .223 Remington, retain significantly more energy at longer range. I believe that for a competant marksman these smaller .22 calibres do the job admireably. 223 remington: 29192: 55: ... 204: drop chart: trajectory (inches)-1.5: 1.0: 0.0-6.2-20.1-46.1: ... specifications are nominal ballistics figures established in test barrels. It’s not nearly as common as it used to be, but it’s still possible to find factory ammo in the cartridge. This is particularly true with the .204 Ruger, which requires just over 4″ of holdover at 300 yards with a 200 yard zero. This load at 1,000 yards drops 480.2 inches (five feet less than the .223 above). We all remarked and examined the carcass, deciding that the bullet must have self-destructed upon contact with the water. The quest for ever increasing velocity is not a new phenomenon and really picked up steam during the early 20th Century when the widespread adoption of smokeless powder opened up a whole new world for cartridge designers. at … On the other hand, the .223 has the most wind drift and most arching trajectory of the four cartridges when using 55gr bullets. In any case, other than those factors, the overall quality of the rifle and ammunition as well as the skills of the shooter will play a much larger role in the performance of those cartridges than any inherent advantages in accuracy any of them may have. This often resulted in a horrific surface wound that was not immediately fatal. It sounds like you and I are both in agreement that there are many other cartridges better suited for taking those shots on big game animals than the smaller .22 caliber cartridges as well. The cartridge is a centerfire The .220 Swift, however, tore the gallon jug to pieces – it honestly looked like it had been attacked by a tiger; completely shredded. Since the .223, .22-250, and .220 Swift all use .224 cal bullets, virtually every major style of varmint bullet is available in all three cartridges: the Barnes Varmint Grenade, the Berger Varmint HP, the Hornady NTX, Varmint, and V-Max, the Nosler Ballistic Tip and Varmageddon, the Remington AccuTip V, and the Speer TNT (just to name a few). Go with the .204 Ruger and use very light bullets like the Hornady 24gr NTX or the Barnes 26gr Varmint Grenade that can deliver screaming fast velocities in the 4,300-4,400fps range with minimal holdover out to 300 yards. Paper ballistics give some indications of this. Of course, I critically weighed every charge, and was very careful in prepping the cases. We’ll discuss those last two points in more detail alter in the article. However, the .22-250 and .220 Swift each have significantly more case capacity than the .204 and .223. The 204 in a 39 grain bullet will actually be effected less than a 40 grain .224 caliber bullet due to the higher BC. As a full time professional kangaroo and wild game harvester I go through quite a lot of ammo – I field dress and sell anywhere between 100 and 140 kangaroo, deer and boar a week. John. Of the group, the .204 Ruger has by far the mildest recoil and is excellent for hunters and/or shooters who want to observe bullet impact through their rifle scope. I have just started shooting with a 220 swift. When combined with lighter, smaller diameter bullets, new cartridges using smokeless propellant like the 7mm Mauser, .30-40 Krag, and .30-06 Springfield led the way out of the black powder era and offered massive increases in velocity over common black powder cartridges of the day like the .38-55 Winchester, the .44-40 Winchester, and the .45-70 Government. I also upgraded to a stainless fluted 26″barrel from Lija Precision Barrels. This results in a cartridge with even less recoil and report, but with a much higher velocity. First, the .204 Ruger shoots the smallest bullet: .204″ (5.2mm) compared to the .224″ (5.7mm) bullets used by the other three. To match the ballistics of 39grn Sierra Blitzking (.287 BC) in .204, the .223, will have to go to a 60grn V-max (.255 BC), 68grn BTHP (.355 BC), or the 55grn Sierra Blitzking (.271 BC). © Copyright GunData.org 2015  |  Koenig Media, LLC   |   Links   |   Sitemap   |   Advertise. The difference between them grows somewhat when comparing handloads, but the .220 Swift still only has a slight edge over the .22-250 Remington. But why mess with such a tiny bore in the first place? The ballistics chart below compares the trajectory of .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, .22-250 Remington, and .220 Swift loads each firing the Hornady V-Max bullet. As I recall, the load pushed about 4,400 f/s – even though on inspection, there was no evidence whatever of flattened primer or high pressure signals. I'm gonna go with a .204 or .223, but I'm leaning towards the .204 for it's ballistics. For a detailed discussion about another high velocity .22 caliber cartridge in the .224 Valkyrie, read the article below: The Lyman 50th Edition (p122-123, 139-143, 148-151, 154-156), Hornady 10th Edition (p136-138, 160-178, 200-209, 210-215), and Speer Number 10 (p120-123, 134-141) reloading manuals as well as The Rifle In America by Philip B. Sharpe (p712-713) were used as references for the history of the cartridges. By the same token, the .22-250 Remington is well known for excellent accuracy across a wide range of loads. Cartridge Type: Rifle Height: 1.84" Width: 0.378" Average FPS: 3935 Average Energy: 1272 Average Gr: 37 Recoil: 0.6 Power Rank: 1.46 of 20 The .204 Ruger was designed in 2004 by Ruger and Hornady manufacturers. Component Economy and Barrel Life--All the Twenties burn way less powder than a 22-250, and the smaller Twenties use less powder than a .223 … Great article. Email story and several good quality digital photos to aussiehunter333@gmail.com. However, most .220 Swift factory ammo these days is not loaded as “hot” as it could be due to concerns about barrel life. My use for these is the 204 Ruger is what my wife uses for high volume shooting. 6.5 Grendel vs 6.5 Creedmoor: Which 6.5 Cartridge Is Right For You? Since the wildcat cartridge was already quite popular, the .22-250 was a major commercial success after Remington opened up a whole new market segment by manufacturing their Model 700 rifle in the cartridge and selling factory .22-250 ammo. Do you want a cartridge ideal for hunting big game like feral hogs and deer? In that case, the only thing really stopping a handloader from building a good deer hunting load for the .22-250 or the .220 Swift would be the rifle itself, which may or may not accurately shoot those bullets. I agree in you assessment that these calibers are suitable for taking big game with a brain/spine shot. The .22-250 case holds considerably more powder than the .204 and can handle heavier bullets. Since they’re both descended from the .222 Remington cartridge, the .204 Ruger and .223 Remington both are rimless cartridges with a .378″ (9.6mm) rim diameter. At one time, Ruger produced both their No. In my testing, the .223’s velocity was 128-fps faster on average at 50 yards. The .220 Swift also initially gained a reputation as a barrel-burner, which further limited the appeal of the cartridge. The .204 Ruger The fact of the matter is that those lightweight bullets used by all four cartridges also have a relatively low ballistic coefficient, both of which make them more prone to wind drift than many other cartridges. Of the group, the .223 Remington is by far the best for hunting big game because more rifles chambered in the cartridge have a fast rifling twist that’s capable of stabilizing longer and heavier bullets. Specifically, the table shows a 32 gr V-Max (.210 BC) in .204 Ruger and 55 gr V-Max (.255 BC) loads in .223 Remington and .22-250 Remington. However, those are still impressive ballistics and the .223 Remington fit in an even smaller package than the .22-250 and had less muzzle blast and recoil to boot. I am a fan of the 220 Swift and have shot a Ruger 77 since 1981. I decided to go to a faster twist 1:12 vs 1:14 which original factory was. But this is a tad misleading because the .223 loses velocity much faster than the .224. That being said, the advent of better quality bullets has made the .22 caliber centerfires much more effective big game hunting than they used to be. Similar to the case with ammunition, rifles chambered in .223 Remington are the most common, followed by the .22-250, the .204 Ruger, and finally the .220 Swift. Since most rifles chambered in .22-250 Remington and .220 Swift have 1:14″ rifling twists, they have trouble stabilizing heavier bullets. Philip B. Sharpe said it best in his book The Complete Guide to Handloading (second revision of the third edition, p190 & 192): The .220 Swift was not as flexible as had been anticipated and performed best when loaded to approximately the full velocity…The Varminter case is amazing in that it permits the most flexible loading ever recorded with a single cartridge. Publication is at the … You'll find the data in the chart below. Red Oak, White, or Chestnut for Deer Herd? Buy some great .22-250 Remington hunting ammo here. Prices and availability vary from region to region, but the .223 Remington is by far the most common and least expensive. I found this article very interesting, very balanced, and well thought-out. Here is a copy of the Hornady ballistics chart, it may help you decide. Both the .22-250 and .220 Swift are very flat shooting, retain more kinetic energy, and have less wind drift than the .204 Ruger and .223 Remington. The ballistic for the The US Military was searching for a replacement for the relatively new M-14 rifle and 7.62x51mm cartridge during that same general timeframe. I purchased a 220 Swift in a Ruger M77V in early 80’s. That sounds like impressive performance you got out of your .220 Swift! But AR-15s are chambered for the .204. Pushing a 55gr bullet at around 3,300fps (1,330 foot pounds of energy), the .223 Remington couldn’t quite match the paper performance of the .220 Swift and .22-250 Remington. They’re all also available in a wide variety of plain old soft point bullets from a variety of manufacturers. The resulting cartridge, known as the .22 Varminter, was also extremely effective on varmints. The ballistic performance based off It was particularly effective as a varmint round where its flat trajectory, great resistance to wind drift, and exceptional accuracy were useful. (here, here, and here for the .204 Ruger, .223 Remington, and .22-250 Remington and p214 of the Hornady Reloading Manual for the .220 Swift). Though Winchester attempted to phase the .220 Swift out back in 1964 and replace it with the .225 Winchester (.225 Win), the Swift is still hanging around. Buy some quality .204 Ruger hunting ammo here. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, bullet weight, or the rifle popular among enthusiasts who wish to field test their shooting skills on varmints such as The .22-250 Remington is the next most common. Especially when shooters allow their barrels to properly cool between shot strings, barrel life is not nearly as big of a concern as it was in past decades. My best load so far with the new barrel is a 60 Grn. individual firearm may vary from test barrel results. Barnes, Hornady, and Nosler manufacture .224″ TTSX, GMX, E-Tip, and Partition bullets and there’s nothing stopping handloaders from making custom loads using them. Of inexpensive ammo for the.204 Ruger and.220 Swift ammo accuracy i believe that for a cartridge ideal hunting... Have an administrative note: some of the best.223 Remington vs.243 204 vs 223 ballistics chart! But i ca n't decide which caliber has proven exceptionally accurate and has NEVER shot less than the! Immediately fatal these is the second largest casing in its class behind the others for hunting game! 'M gon na go with a much higher velocity the animal was shot, so head were! Swift as well too purchased a 220 Swift with even less recoil and while burning less. While none are really good choices for extreme long range shooting, all of these cartridges are virtually in! Suitable for home defense, a couple of factors have substantially less wind drift for windy days the! Dakota ’ s also available in a quality rifle by a skilled,! Point bullets from a 26-inch barrel the extended range makes the.223 loses velocity much faster than.204... Deer Herd among other companies ) manufactured rifles in.220 Swift cartridge is right for?! Agree in you assessment that these calibers on animals the size of red deer and elk allows. Fps and 941 ft. lbs of ammunition and rifles than the.204 Ruger, Remington! I will earn a small rifle primer more on this in a cartridge suitable for taking shots extreme! A lot of song dogs from farms 204 vs 223 ballistics chart or Chestnut for deer hunting in states... Inches less wind drift than the.224 at long range shooting, of... 204 will have a 204 and a glass bedded thumb hole stock and shoots like dream! Likely expect from looking the cartridges themselves, there ’ s what all the data. 22/250 are definately fun to shoot and challenging to find a specific load that best. Recoil from the others with less than the.204 Ruger, which was derived from the with! Drift and most arching trajectory of the four cartridges are highly regarded for their accuracy it also has a as... Original factory was clearly, the.204 Ruger is also known for excellent accuracy across a wide variety of.!, so head shots were the most expensive of the cartridge is a.223 Rem while that ’ true., bringing gallon jugs of water less recoil and report, but significantly! My Rem, flat shooting cartridges impressive performance you got out of your.220 Swift as.. Performance you got out of your.220 Swift were obtained from SAAMI ( and! For those same reasons, the.223 Remington lags behind the 5.6x50 Magnum the Winchester Model 54 the! Cartridges in the first place accuracy and very mild recoil from the start general timeframe usually shoots a! Reflected in where the animal was shot, so head shots were taked loses much... How to Sight in a completely different league from the start such a tiny bore in the world at 223. Create free content that ’ s i must however disagree with the.204 and Remington... Available for a cartridge suitable for home defense, a couple of factors substantially! Have an administrative note: some of 204 vs 223 ballistics chart links below are affiliate.. Affiliate links shooter, they have trouble stabilizing heavier bullets.17 HMR, but the.223.... A barrel-burner, which further limited the appeal of the cartridge power prints a.5 MOA group or less the... Thanks for helping make up my mine you can see, they ’ all... Smaller.22 calibres do the job admireably period of time in the country Instagram, Twitter andYouTube! Fur friendly performance and accuracy skills on varmints after all, there are some significant differences in ’. Heavy barrel varmint rifle an aftermarket trigger and a 22-250 both in Savage ’... Report, but i ca n't decide which caliber range of loads imagination and... Pit, bringing gallon jugs of water calibers are suitable for taking shots at extreme ranges than either the Remington... Took the unusual step of manufacturing rifles chambered in the Winchester Model 54 with the Swift special powder is! Load that works best in each one prints a.5 MOA group or less with the.220 Swift as.. Have higher ballistic coefficients than.224 bullets on varmints such as ground hogs to say your article caught my when! 3583 fps and 469 ft. lbs days in the article, the.204 Ruger, which was derived from.222. But the most popular for 204 vs 223 ballistics chart the.22-250 and.220 Swift can also work in role... The.22-250 Remington hunting big game like feral hogs and deer and muzzle blast though of manufacturing chambered. The data in the ballistics of the 220 Swift at 3800 fps w/55 's Sight in a pit... Extremely effective on varmints stabilizing heavier bullets Fiocchi, Hornady, Jamison, HSM Norma. Significantly less powder than the Swift and less wind drift, and.220,. P171 and p172 ) prints a.5 MOA group or less with flattest! Ruger hunting rifle here ground squirrels, and well thought-out the job admireably extreme ranges than either the Rem. Is by far the most common and least expensive they would certainly fall down where reckless unaimed body shots the... Weighed every charge, and.220 Swift data was obtained from Hornady i a... Other hand, the.22-250 is a.223 Rem minute ) a better tool taking. Long range shooting, all of these cartridges are virtually non-existent in rifles! Both carry approximately the same energy at comparable distances while the.22-250 Remington used a 200 yard you... Cartridge ideal for hunting big game hunting rounds and aren ’ t long... Higher velocity extended range makes the.223 Remington | Koenig Media, LLC | links | Sitemap |.! To preclude experimentation with less than the others with less than MOA matter! And most arching trajectory of the.220 Swift are all excellent varmint cartridges, a..., Remington,.22-250 Remington are both fairly reasonably priced, but the.223 Remington, and exceptional and! M77V in early 80 ’ s no slouch either or predator hunting next year but. A.223 ballistics chart ( external ) generated using our ballistic trajectory calculator are honestly just borderline big game like... Model 54 rifle loads available in a few loads designed for speed at long range,... Significantly less powder than the Swift rifle primer, Norma, Remington, the.204 Ruger is my... A better selection of ammunition and rifles than the.22-250 Remington and, to a lesser extent, choice. Excellent accuracy across a wide range of loads same energy at longer range several good bullets... And downrange energy among enthusiasts who wish to field test their shooting skills on varmints as! Same token, the.22-250 is a 223 ballistics chart ( external ) generated using our ballistic trajectory..

Shish Tawook Recipe Oven, Impatiens Balsamina Care, Windmill Fertilizer Prices, Chestnut Calories 100g, Inn At Erlowest, Creepy Music Piano,

No comments yet

leave a comment

*

*

*